<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Stonehenge a Round Building?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:49:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: c-dub</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/comment-page-1/#comment-134372</link>
		<dc:creator>c-dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 05:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/#comment-134372</guid>
		<description>This is incredibly weak thinking.  He says, &quot;I... came to the conclusion that Stonehenge must have been a building - and why not?&quot;  And why not?  Coming up with some random scenario and saying &quot;why not?&quot; hardly constitutes a solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is incredibly weak thinking.  He says, "I... came to the conclusion that Stonehenge must have been a building - and why not?"  And why not?  Coming up with some random scenario and saying "why not?" hardly constitutes a solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: col mcgillveray</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/comment-page-1/#comment-132601</link>
		<dc:creator>col mcgillveray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/#comment-132601</guid>
		<description>I,ve been stonehenge a few times,at the free festivals of yore and my theory is that it was designed by dogs so that in the future thier &quot;Masters&quot; would gather enmasse to facilitate a huge canine dog orgy!Seriosly thay always looked like they were have more fun that the crusty hippes and druids who gathered to &quot;Worship&quot; the &quot;Sun&quot;!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I,ve been stonehenge a few times,at the free festivals of yore and my theory is that it was designed by dogs so that in the future thier "Masters" would gather enmasse to facilitate a huge canine dog orgy!Seriosly thay always looked like they were have more fun that the crusty hippes and druids who gathered to "Worship" the "Sun"!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/comment-page-1/#comment-132265</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/#comment-132265</guid>
		<description>They have carbon dated the rocks. That doesn&#039;t help telling us who and when they were put there. This solution is a very real possibility. I&#039;ve always thought that it might have just been a couple of hundred years old, and was a barn or house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have carbon dated the rocks. That doesn't help telling us who and when they were put there. This solution is a very real possibility. I've always thought that it might have just been a couple of hundred years old, and was a barn or house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/comment-page-1/#comment-132087</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/#comment-132087</guid>
		<description>They wouldn&#039;t be likely to find any large beams due to rot over the years. If lucky you can dig up a posthole and notice the change in soil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They wouldn't be likely to find any large beams due to rot over the years. If lucky you can dig up a posthole and notice the change in soil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/comment-page-1/#comment-132042</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/#comment-132042</guid>
		<description>Well, if we&#039;re in this line of thinking, yayo, we should ask: why bother with those heavy stones at all? Just build the thing from timber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if we're in this line of thinking, yayo, we should ask: why bother with those heavy stones at all? Just build the thing from timber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yayo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/comment-page-1/#comment-131836</link>
		<dc:creator>yayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/#comment-131836</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s absurd... Why are the stones placed perpendicular to the radial lines? They would fall... So this guy placed those wooden supports...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it's absurd... Why are the stones placed perpendicular to the radial lines? They would fall... So this guy placed those wooden supports...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/comment-page-1/#comment-131800</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/was-stonehenge-a-round-building/#comment-131800</guid>
		<description>is there evidence to support it, such as large beams found at the site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there evidence to support it, such as large beams found at the site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-24 20:49:47 -->