<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infamous Weapons.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Whittaker</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-858902</link>
		<dc:creator>Whittaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-858902</guid>
		<description>Oswalds rifle is not a 'Mannlicher-Carcano' just a Carcano.  Mannlicher is a completely different company,often assocaited with the Carcano because of several shared parts.  It is the same as calling the rifle a Mauser-Carcano, i.e. completely wrong.  And it was hardly an awful rifle, infact Carcanos were used by the Italian military up until 1945, and are easily accurate enough up to 300 meters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oswalds rifle is not a &#8216;Mannlicher-Carcano&#8217; just a Carcano.  Mannlicher is a completely different company,often assocaited with the Carcano because of several shared parts.  It is the same as calling the rifle a Mauser-Carcano, i.e. completely wrong.  And it was hardly an awful rifle, infact Carcanos were used by the Italian military up until 1945, and are easily accurate enough up to 300 meters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J farmer</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-133251</link>
		<dc:creator>J farmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-133251</guid>
		<description>"Man â€¦ that paragraph makes me freaking sick to my stomach. So he pretty much just stole the gun then huh? I cannot wait untill this guy is out of office. Heâ€™s no better than a poacher, showing off is trophy. What a sneaky thief." quote
What is wrong with you? its just a gun! If the police take your illegal gun its theirs!
There is a BIG difference between a poacher and someone giving you a gun as a gift. Do you know what a poacher is? thats a poor analogy.
I am tired of the thought we will stop senseless killing if we get rid of guns. Well we will always have people killing other people,get ride of guns then get rid of knives, then poison ect..
The problem is stupid people who don't know the first thing about a gun or gun safety, keep it locked up keep it unloaded and up out of reach of kids. treat a unloaded gun as if it is always loaded.
By the way a unloaded gun on a wall collecting dust is one of the safest guns to have, far different than the killing of a rare animal. Get over it!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Man â€¦ that paragraph makes me freaking sick to my stomach. So he pretty much just stole the gun then huh? I cannot wait untill this guy is out of office. Heâ€™s no better than a poacher, showing off is trophy. What a sneaky thief.&#8221; quote<br />
What is wrong with you? its just a gun! If the police take your illegal gun its theirs!<br />
There is a BIG difference between a poacher and someone giving you a gun as a gift. Do you know what a poacher is? thats a poor analogy.<br />
I am tired of the thought we will stop senseless killing if we get rid of guns. Well we will always have people killing other people,get ride of guns then get rid of knives, then poison ect..<br />
The problem is stupid people who don&#8217;t know the first thing about a gun or gun safety, keep it locked up keep it unloaded and up out of reach of kids. treat a unloaded gun as if it is always loaded.<br />
By the way a unloaded gun on a wall collecting dust is one of the safest guns to have, far different than the killing of a rare animal. Get over it!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fodder</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-133190</link>
		<dc:creator>Fodder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-133190</guid>
		<description>For Mark - â€œThe gun that Lee Harvey Oswald [wiki] allegedly used to assassinate President John F. Kennedyâ€¦â€

There is still some question as to whether that rifle was used to assassinate Kennedy. That Mannlicher-Carcano is one of the worst rifles ever built, most were damaged by sabotage during WWII and no one was ever able to replicate the assassination with that particular long gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Mark - â€œThe gun that Lee Harvey Oswald [wiki] allegedly used to assassinate President John F. Kennedyâ€¦â€</p>
<p>There is still some question as to whether that rifle was used to assassinate Kennedy. That Mannlicher-Carcano is one of the worst rifles ever built, most were damaged by sabotage during WWII and no one was ever able to replicate the assassination with that particular long gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Mosley</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-132592</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Mosley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-132592</guid>
		<description>One final word:

Henry Derringer's surname was actually spelled Deringer. His imitators who later cashed in on his fame merely changed the spelling to Derringer to evade the weak copyright laws then in place. Deringer did indeed conceive the "derringer" and produced the first model, but his imitators quickly overwhelmed him and it is their imitations - and altered trade name - that are remembered today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One final word:</p>
<p>Henry Derringer&#8217;s surname was actually spelled Deringer. His imitators who later cashed in on his fame merely changed the spelling to Derringer to evade the weak copyright laws then in place. Deringer did indeed conceive the &#8220;derringer&#8221; and produced the first model, but his imitators quickly overwhelmed him and it is their imitations - and altered trade name - that are remembered today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adroni</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-132389</link>
		<dc:creator>Adroni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-132389</guid>
		<description>In regards to the Booth pistol. It is common to load muzzle-loaders with ammunition slightly smaller in diameter than the actual caliber of the weapon. The ball is wrapped in a lubricated patch that takes up the excess space and ensures a proper gas seal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the Booth pistol. It is common to load muzzle-loaders with ammunition slightly smaller in diameter than the actual caliber of the weapon. The ball is wrapped in a lubricated patch that takes up the excess space and ensures a proper gas seal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William S. Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-132273</link>
		<dc:creator>William S. Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-132273</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Booth Derringer, as others have noted, was a percussion firearm, not a flintlock.  A percussion cap was fitted over a pierced nipple (yes, that is the correct term) to ignite the powder in the barrel breech and fire the weapon.

However, although the FBI purportedly examined the weapon and bullet in 1997, the bullet was determined to be too corroded for any reasonable ballistics testing, so it "probably" was a .44 caliber lead ball.  You can check these facts @: http://wesclark.com/jw/booth_pistol.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Booth Derringer, as others have noted, was a percussion firearm, not a flintlock.  A percussion cap was fitted over a pierced nipple (yes, that is the correct term) to ignite the powder in the barrel breech and fire the weapon.</p>
<p>However, although the FBI purportedly examined the weapon and bullet in 1997, the bullet was determined to be too corroded for any reasonable ballistics testing, so it &#8220;probably&#8221; was a .44 caliber lead ball.  You can check these facts @: <a href="http://wesclark.com/jw/booth_pistol.html" rel="nofollow">http://wesclark.com/jw/booth_pistol.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-132262</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-132262</guid>
		<description>OK, I assumed that this was a mostly American site and all the posters were keen on the ins and outs of the weapons - maybe I didn't actually read the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I assumed that this was a mostly American site and all the posters were keen on the ins and outs of the weapons - maybe I didn&#8217;t actually read the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Mosley</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-132132</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Mosley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-132132</guid>
		<description>Ok, I looked it up.

The derringer WAS a .44 caliber, BUT Booth had loaded a .41 caliber ball, which is the part I remembered. Seems to me to be a deliberate attempt to baffle scholars.

This info may be found on the FBI's website, where modern day tests on the Booth derringer were conducted to learn more about the actual assassination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I looked it up.</p>
<p>The derringer WAS a .44 caliber, BUT Booth had loaded a .41 caliber ball, which is the part I remembered. Seems to me to be a deliberate attempt to baffle scholars.</p>
<p>This info may be found on the FBI&#8217;s website, where modern day tests on the Booth derringer were conducted to learn more about the actual assassination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131847</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131847</guid>
		<description>Heather -

Last time I checked, Sarajevo, Italy, and Sadaam's spider hole are all well outside the US.  There is nothing wrong with privately owned guns; in fact they are valuable tools to protect people's freedoms both from oppressive governments and from forces without.

You mention you are from the UK. I'm assume that you are too young to know much about the many thousands of civilian Brits (including many women and old men) who made up the British Home Guard (Local Defence Volunteers) during the Second World War.  There was an extremely real threat that the British Isles would be invaded (read about Operation Sea Lion -- the Nazi plan to do just that).  Whilst that never came to be, the Home Guard was ready with their own weapons (read GUNS!) to slow the Germans down and impede their progress wherever possible.  This wasn't "busywork", but the real deal -- government owned weapons were in very short supply (lots left on the beach at Dunkirk unfortunately), so those privately owned rifles, shotguns, and pistols were one of the big things ensuring your nation's freedom.  Read about how dire Winston Churchill considered the situation in his 6 volume history of the Second World War.  Private gun ownership was there to protect your freedom.  Fortunately, the RAF stopped the Luftwaffe first, but that was a monumental upset -- far from a "given" at the time.

Straight talk from Sid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather -</p>
<p>Last time I checked, Sarajevo, Italy, and Sadaam&#8217;s spider hole are all well outside the US.  There is nothing wrong with privately owned guns; in fact they are valuable tools to protect people&#8217;s freedoms both from oppressive governments and from forces without.</p>
<p>You mention you are from the UK. I&#8217;m assume that you are too young to know much about the many thousands of civilian Brits (including many women and old men) who made up the British Home Guard (Local Defence Volunteers) during the Second World War.  There was an extremely real threat that the British Isles would be invaded (read about Operation Sea Lion &#8212; the Nazi plan to do just that).  Whilst that never came to be, the Home Guard was ready with their own weapons (read GUNS!) to slow the Germans down and impede their progress wherever possible.  This wasn&#8217;t &#8220;busywork&#8221;, but the real deal &#8212; government owned weapons were in very short supply (lots left on the beach at Dunkirk unfortunately), so those privately owned rifles, shotguns, and pistols were one of the big things ensuring your nation&#8217;s freedom.  Read about how dire Winston Churchill considered the situation in his 6 volume history of the Second World War.  Private gun ownership was there to protect your freedom.  Fortunately, the RAF stopped the Luftwaffe first, but that was a monumental upset &#8212; far from a &#8220;given&#8221; at the time.</p>
<p>Straight talk from Sid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131733</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131733</guid>
		<description>I've never thought that Neatorama readers are so into weapons!  Thank you to Gert Verhoog, Sig Nelson, Mark, and Tiago for pointing out the typo. That was my mistake. My thanks to the Neatorama editor who fixed it (whoever you are!)

I must admit I don't know anything about guns, but I've double checked the Oswald rifle details on the post against the hard copy. Here's some more info about the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle" rel="nofollow"&gt;infamous rifle&lt;/a&gt;.

Rober and Sid Morrison, I'll defer to your expertise in identifying flintlock vs. caplock. I can barely tell the difference between flintlock and the flintstones, but that is what's on my hard copy.  I'll let the article stand, but people will be able tell from your comments.

Tim Mosley, regarding the caliber of the Booth gun, wikipedia had it listed as .44 (as did the hardcopy of this article). Now, I'm not sure either was right, but I'll let the article stand - with your caveat in the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never thought that Neatorama readers are so into weapons!  Thank you to Gert Verhoog, Sig Nelson, Mark, and Tiago for pointing out the typo. That was my mistake. My thanks to the Neatorama editor who fixed it (whoever you are!)</p>
<p>I must admit I don&#8217;t know anything about guns, but I&#8217;ve double checked the Oswald rifle details on the post against the hard copy. Here&#8217;s some more info about the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle" rel="nofollow">infamous rifle</a>.</p>
<p>Rober and Sid Morrison, I&#8217;ll defer to your expertise in identifying flintlock vs. caplock. I can barely tell the difference between flintlock and the flintstones, but that is what&#8217;s on my hard copy.  I&#8217;ll let the article stand, but people will be able tell from your comments.</p>
<p>Tim Mosley, regarding the caliber of the Booth gun, wikipedia had it listed as .44 (as did the hardcopy of this article). Now, I&#8217;m not sure either was right, but I&#8217;ll let the article stand - with your caveat in the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jester</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131610</link>
		<dc:creator>Jester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131610</guid>
		<description>Get off your high horse, Heather. In case you didn't read the article (obviously not) it's GUNS FROM AROUND THE WORLD. THROUGHOUT HISTORY. And can't you see that from the US, whiny little pissants who want to moralize everything they can get their grubby little hands on look like complete idiots when they spew out their little comments on everything. (Not that I feel that is the case in the UK, and apologies to all the normal Brits over there who enjoy light reading about HISTORY like the rest of us!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get off your high horse, Heather. In case you didn&#8217;t read the article (obviously not) it&#8217;s GUNS FROM AROUND THE WORLD. THROUGHOUT HISTORY. And can&#8217;t you see that from the US, whiny little pissants who want to moralize everything they can get their grubby little hands on look like complete idiots when they spew out their little comments on everything. (Not that I feel that is the case in the UK, and apologies to all the normal Brits over there who enjoy light reading about HISTORY like the rest of us!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131592</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131592</guid>
		<description>Why are Americans obsessed with guns?  I looked at the comments to see if anyone said they couldn't care less about which gun did what, but no, you're all in a discussion about them.  Apologies if you are not Americans, but can't you see that from the UK it looks like you all go round murdering each other, because guns are so easy to buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are Americans obsessed with guns?  I looked at the comments to see if anyone said they couldn&#8217;t care less about which gun did what, but no, you&#8217;re all in a discussion about them.  Apologies if you are not Americans, but can&#8217;t you see that from the UK it looks like you all go round murdering each other, because guns are so easy to buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131590</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131590</guid>
		<description>i was going to say WW1 not 2 .. but i see its been taken care of =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was going to say WW1 not 2 .. but i see its been taken care of =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131586</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131586</guid>
		<description>biltmore, you're right.  He should give that pistol back to Saddam.  Saddam bought it with his own money, and he deserves to have it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>biltmore, you&#8217;re right.  He should give that pistol back to Saddam.  Saddam bought it with his own money, and he deserves to have it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131577</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131577</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Manlicher-Carcano is 6.5x52mm, not making it a .30 caliber, as stated in other posts. .30 caliber rifles typically are designated as 7.62mm x ?. Several examples of this are the 7.62x51mm (.308 NATO), 7.62x39mm (SKS, AK-47, etc), and the 7.62x54mm (Mosin-Nagant and Dragunov).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Manlicher-Carcano is 6.5&#215;52mm, not making it a .30 caliber, as stated in other posts. .30 caliber rifles typically are designated as 7.62mm x ?. Several examples of this are the 7.62&#215;51mm (.308 NATO), 7.62&#215;39mm (SKS, AK-47, etc), and the 7.62&#215;54mm (Mosin-Nagant and Dragunov).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lasse</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131544</link>
		<dc:creator>Lasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131544</guid>
		<description>Actually, ww1 lead to ww2, so maybe its not a typo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, ww1 lead to ww2, so maybe its not a typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Mosley</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131541</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Mosley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131541</guid>
		<description>Lots of errors here, Uncle John.

Oswald's rifle was not a .38 caliber, but was actually a .30 caliber, and even this is wrong since the actual cartridge was a metric cartridge of 7.65 mm.

And it seems to me that Booth's pistol was actually a .41 caliber, not .44, as .41 was a very common derringer caliber of that era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of errors here, Uncle John.</p>
<p>Oswald&#8217;s rifle was not a .38 caliber, but was actually a .30 caliber, and even this is wrong since the actual cartridge was a metric cartridge of 7.65 mm.</p>
<p>And it seems to me that Booth&#8217;s pistol was actually a .41 caliber, not .44, as .41 was a very common derringer caliber of that era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131470</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131470</guid>
		<description>Rober is right! A flintlock is easily identifiable -- the hammer has a little clamp that holds a piece of flint.  This bad boy takes replaceable caps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rober is right! A flintlock is easily identifiable &#8212; the hammer has a little clamp that holds a piece of flint.  This bad boy takes replaceable caps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rober</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131446</link>
		<dc:creator>Rober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131446</guid>
		<description>"...The gun is a single-shot flintlock, made by Philadelphia gunsmith Henry Derringer. Itâ€™s tiny - just six inches total in length with a 2 1/2" barrel - but itâ€™s powerful, firing a .44-calibur bullet."

The gun shown is not a flintlock, rather it is a caplock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;The gun is a single-shot flintlock, made by Philadelphia gunsmith Henry Derringer. Itâ€™s tiny - just six inches total in length with a 2 1/2&#8243; barrel - but itâ€™s powerful, firing a .44-calibur bullet.&#8221;</p>
<p>The gun shown is not a flintlock, rather it is a caplock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131233</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131233</guid>
		<description>"...was used by Gavrilo Princip to assassinate Archduke Franz Ferdinand and precipitate World War II." You mean World War I.

"The gun that Lee Harvey Oswald [wiki] allegedly used to assassinate President John F. Kennedy..." 

Good grief. "Allegedly?" The commie shot JFK, get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;was used by Gavrilo Princip to assassinate Archduke Franz Ferdinand and precipitate World War II.&#8221; You mean World War I.</p>
<p>&#8220;The gun that Lee Harvey Oswald [wiki] allegedly used to assassinate President John F. Kennedy&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>Good grief. &#8220;Allegedly?&#8221; The commie shot JFK, get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131232</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131232</guid>
		<description>Abraham Lincoln was most likely NOT killed by the bullet.  His doctors kept probing his brain with metal rods trying to locate the bullet. The more they probed, the worst he got. The rods were doing 10 times the damage that the bullet ever did. 

Many people are alive today with bullets in their brain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abraham Lincoln was most likely NOT killed by the bullet.  His doctors kept probing his brain with metal rods trying to locate the bullet. The more they probed, the worst he got. The rods were doing 10 times the damage that the bullet ever did. </p>
<p>Many people are alive today with bullets in their brain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sig Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131205</link>
		<dc:creator>Sig Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131205</guid>
		<description>small type in the story: The assasination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand led to WWI, not WWII.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>small type in the story: The assasination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand led to WWI, not WWII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusedal</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131120</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusedal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131120</guid>
		<description>The assasination of Franz Ferdinand precipitated World War I, not II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The assasination of Franz Ferdinand precipitated World War I, not II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gert Verhoog</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131095</link>
		<dc:creator>Gert Verhoog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131095</guid>
		<description>Thanks for yet another interesting list! One small point: Gavrilo Princip's assassination of Franz Ferdinand started world war I (one), not II (two).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for yet another interesting list! One small point: Gavrilo Princip&#8217;s assassination of Franz Ferdinand started world war I (one), not II (two).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biltmore</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/21/infamous-weapons/#comment-131076</link>
		<dc:creator>biltmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/06/19/infamous-weapons/#comment-131076</guid>
		<description>"When news of the war souvenir broke in May 2004, reporters asked President Bush if he planned to give the pistol to the next Iraqi president. No, he said, it "is now the property of the American government." The gun is kept in a small study off the Oval Office, and according to one White House visitor who late spoke to Time magazine, the president "really liked showing it off. He was really proud of it.""

Man ... that paragraph makes me freaking sick to my stomach. So he pretty much just stole the gun then huh? I cannot wait untill this guy is out of office. He's no better than a poacher, showing off is trophy. What a sneaky thief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When news of the war souvenir broke in May 2004, reporters asked President Bush if he planned to give the pistol to the next Iraqi president. No, he said, it &#8220;is now the property of the American government.&#8221; The gun is kept in a small study off the Oval Office, and according to one White House visitor who late spoke to Time magazine, the president &#8220;really liked showing it off. He was really proud of it.&#8221;"</p>
<p>Man &#8230; that paragraph makes me freaking sick to my stomach. So he pretty much just stole the gun then huh? I cannot wait untill this guy is out of office. He&#8217;s no better than a poacher, showing off is trophy. What a sneaky thief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
