A Tale of a Greedy Charity.

Posted by Alex in Money & Finance on May 28, 2007 at 1:37 pm


Neighbors were completely surprised to learn that when modest-living Hector Guy Di Stefano and his wife Doris died, they left a $264 million estate to be divided equally among 8 charities, among them them the Salvation Army [wiki] and Greenpeace [wiki].

But there was a snag: the couple left the money to Greenpeace International Inc., but before they died, Greenpeace International Inc. was dissolved and absorbed into a larger outfit, Greenpeace Fund. All of the charities had no problem with this technicality (after all, they weren’t expecting any money - the Di Stefanos didn’t tell them beforehand). All, except for one: the Salvation Army.

Apparently, $33 million wasn’t enough for the Salvation Army - it sued to prevent Greenpeace from its share of the bequest, arguing that the entity the Di Stefanos had left money to no longer existed and that the money should instead be divided equally amongst the remaining 7 charities! The rest of the charities stood to gain an extra $6 million, but no one wanted to come near Salvation Army’s lawsuit.

Earlier this May, the Salvation Army and Greenpeace settled their lawsuit: it seems like the Salvation Army will get the $6 million extra share of Greenpeace’s slice of money, while Greenpeace will still get about $27 million.

Ain’t that a crazy story?

Links: Seattle Times | LA Times articles - via Don’t Tell the Donor


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post


FROM THE NEATORAMA ONLINE STORE - Your purchase helps support the blog!



COMMENT

32 comments to "A Tale of a Greedy Charity."

  1. biltmore
    May 28th, 2007 at 2:57 pm

    Wow, that’s freaking rediculous. What a bunch of crooked bastards.

  2. Yak Boy
    May 28th, 2007 at 3:04 pm

    Here’s the thing:

    The Salvation Army is NOT a charity, it is a CHURCH.

    There is no separation between the Salvation Army religious sect & the charitable organisation.

    They operate in much the same way as the Mormons or the Jehovah’s Witnesses - they give charity to the needy but use it as a cover to hock their religious beliefs.

    If the story had been about the Mormons or the JW’s squeezing money from another charity, no-one would have been surprised. But, for some unknown reason, the Salvation Army seems to have built up a veneer of respectability.

    Hopefully people might now take notice and start to see the Salvo’s for what they really are.

  3. biltmore
    May 28th, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    Oh that makes me hate them even more now. Thanks Yak Boy! I knew that something evil was going on with TSA.

  4. Another Jake
    May 28th, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    Psh. Every organization, charitable or otherwise makes some bad judgment calls. And honestly, I’d rather if Greenpeace didn’t get the money. Those folks are the Corleones of the green movement.

  5. Moon
    May 28th, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    Well, maybe when you get millions to donate to charity, you can ignore Greenpeace. But that obviously wasn’t the intention of the DiStefanos.

  6. Robert Aronson
    May 28th, 2007 at 6:36 pm

    The Salvation Army may have made a bad call, but Greenpeace is ridiculous. I’m all for preserving the environment, but not at the expense of aiding Greenpeace. They’re just crazy. From what I hear, most or all of the founders of that movement/organization resigned because it became nothing more than a radical, political machine filled with as many crackpot zealots as any cult.

    Also, people need to remember that there’s far more to every story than what one reads in the newspaper. It’s best not to jump to quick judgements. I tend to not trust any news story that seems totally one-sided, whether or not I like which side won.

  7. Jesus
    May 28th, 2007 at 8:04 pm

    The salvation army is a cult.

    In my city they make some people listen to their sermons before giving handouts (that were donated).

  8. a fundraiser
    May 28th, 2007 at 10:40 pm

    Thanks for the link! I’m glad you are covering this story.

  9. Eric
    May 28th, 2007 at 11:47 pm

    I’ve had a bad taste for the Salvation Army since a friend of mine went to help with hurricane relief (not Katrina). The Salvation Army provided them with coffee…at a charge. How cheap.

  10. Alex
    May 29th, 2007 at 12:05 am

    Bad call? Bad call is when you go for greasy Chinese when you know you shouldn’t. Or maybe hitting the golf ball with the wrong club.

    Filing a lawsuit to stiff another entity over money from the kindness of strangers is so much more than just a bad judgment call.

  11. Another Jake
    May 29th, 2007 at 1:02 am

    Let’s just say my definition of “bad call” is a bit broader than yours, anyway I didn’t say it was a “minor” bad judgment call. I’m just saying that some corporate loony made a bad decision that soiled the spirit of the organization. The salvation army is non-profit and somebody probably got too caught up in keeping the budget tight. or maybe they got greedy, but that doesn’t explain it too well since they don’t really pocket the money. I mean, there aren’t shareholders.

    Anyone picturing Mr. Burns writhing his hands and going all “Smithers! Go take those dead people’s money this instant! …Excellent.” is probably less right than someone picturing an overstressed budget-managing executive going all “How am I gonna keep this place running?! I’m gonna get canned!”

    It doesn’t matter anyway really since they will lose the lawsuit, greenpeace will get their cut, as they should, and somebody at salvation army will hopefully get the axe.

  12. Lasse
    May 29th, 2007 at 1:13 am

    Corleones of the green movement? What do you think all the industrialist lobby organizations are doing? At least one mobster works for the right cause.

  13. Dave
    May 29th, 2007 at 8:10 am

    Without knowing any of the details, my first guess is that the SA folks saw the redirection of the money to the Greenpeace Fund as a breach of the specifics of the Di Stefano’s will. Wills designating money going to organizations are usually very specific in where the money goes; it didn’t likely say just “Greenpeace”, but referred to a specific legal entity that existed at the time the will was drawn up. Apparently nobody saw a need to amend the will when Greenpeace dissolved.

    The Salvation Army folks were in the right, following the letter of the Di Stefano’s will, as the trustees of the estate had no business futzing with the details of who got what after the death of the Di Stephanos. The trustees, for whatever reason, chose to pursue the spirit of the will, and although I can’t say that I would’ve done the same, I can see their intentions. That said, I can’t fault SA for their actions; they were only trying to get the specifics of the will carried out, which to them was divvying up the money between the organizations specified in the will. Greenpeace Fund was not in the list.

    Those of you who do fault them would probably fault them regardless of the circumstances, as you likely would with any Christian organization. Guess bigotry knows no bounds.

  14. Eric
    May 29th, 2007 at 8:48 am

    nuke greenpeace

  15. Gerry
    May 29th, 2007 at 8:55 am

    While I would never give to Greenpeace,
    now I’ll also know NOT to give to
    the Salvation Army. No more Christmas buckets.

  16. phoenix
    May 29th, 2007 at 11:31 am

    Typical Salvation Army.

  17. Jake
    May 29th, 2007 at 12:28 pm

    My name’s David. *fart noise*

  18. a fundraiser
    May 29th, 2007 at 2:37 pm

    I thought you’d be interested to know that the matter has since been settled through mediation. I posted a follow-up piece on the settlement:

    http://donttellthedonor.blogspot.com/2007/05/greenpeace-survives-shake down-from.html

  19. c-dub
    May 30th, 2007 at 6:10 pm

    Robert Aronson says that Greenpeace is full of crackpots “from what [he] hears” — but then chastises people for believing everything they hear. How interesting.

    Another Jake: this clearly isn’t an example of one “budget-managing executive” making a “bad call.” A lawsuits of this magnitude wouldn’t get filed and litigated without the support of church leadership.

    And Dave, I really doubt that the Salvation Army was really “only trying to get the specifics of the will carried out,” as if the church were only looking out for the interest of the deceased. They were trying to get more money; the interest of the deceased was clearly contrary to theirs.

  20. Alex
    May 30th, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    The ending of the story is quite telling: the lawsuit is privately settled when Salvation Army goes away with the extra $6 million it would’ve gotten by cutting out Greenpeace.

    Hm, somehow I think that contradicted the explanation of “carrying out the letter of the will.”

  21. davemooregan
    October 12th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    Knowing that, we need to think about how we are going to use the tools we’ve got to make the most out of them. How can we use this site to make amazing things happen, You can make real connections with real people on here and see how that same amount of money impacts their lives. Yeah!!! send those greed bastards to us and we’ll exploit them! http://www.greedypeople.com

  22. A Christian
    November 3rd, 2008 at 10:26 am

    I am currently employed by The Salvation Army in the NE division. Sadly, after working for over a year I have witnessed some of the worst of what the army does not want YOU to know. They are a cult and if you are not a family member and just a regular employee you stand alone and will be eliminated after they have used you up and spit you out. Make no mistake, they are as corrupt as the day is long. The individuals (”Majors”-which is another joke) who run these corps in each county of each state are personally taken care of very well. A $250,000.00 house, two new foriegn cars, new expensive furniture, all their food and clothing and utilities paid for also, all insurance and gas. It is a joke. All those poor bastards putting money in these kettles thinking they are doing the right thing are privately being mocked by an institution that was once on the proper track and was respectable, it is now as corrupt as anything I have ever read about or witnessed. Be careful too, if they know you are exposing their secrets they will come after you with a vengence. This organization does not share any information and is not as any other 501c3 is required to do and is not viewable on Guidestar, they only list the top commissioner’s salary in Washington, DC and what is listed is such a lie. His base salary may appear to be low, but what is unknown is that money is just for his own enjoyment, every and I repeat every expense possible is taken care of by YOU, the donor, by providing this corrupt organization with carte blanche to lie cheat and steal from the American public. This organization needs auditied and will be soon, get ready boys, because your time is a comin’ to be exposed for all the treachery and lies.

  23. Quakemom777
    November 27th, 2008 at 11:01 pm

    To A Christian, I too am employed by TSA for several years now and am experiencing just what you described because I am not a “soldier”, everything you stated is true, and especially about how the officers are provided for, no tax accountability and the books are always a year’n'half/two years behind so you can never really know. Thanks for speaking up, glad I found this page. If I didn’t need my job, I wouldn’t hang around, has just about finished me off for any kind of church, still love the Lord though!

  24. Not a Fan of the Sally Ann
    December 7th, 2008 at 10:34 am

    Bang on, the above comments from “insiders” working for the SA. I, too, worked for them on a four-month contract last year. As a Christian, I applied for the job, because I’d assumed they were a Christian organization. They’re not — they’re a money-making, brainwashing cult, plain and simple. I saw how they treated those who came to them for help, and I was appalled. I ended up quitting before the end of my contract, I just couldn’t deal with the duplicity and hypocrisy anymore. As with most other charities, the “front-line workers” are for the most part enthusiastic, heart-felt volunteers who put on a good show for the public, while those in positions of power behind the scenes are cold, callous money-grubbers. The brainwashing was most evident higher up the ranks. They put the SA in the position of God.

  25. The Colonel
    January 11th, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    I have been with The Salvation Army for many, many years. We have it downpat! We preach with tears in our eyes and state the horrible atrocities of the lonely widows and while your’e at it, how about writin me a check for $10,000. No one will challenge the army, no one, we can do what we want, when we want it and laugh all the way to the bank. What suckers we have made out of the American public, but thanks for the ride, it’s been great, my retirement package was sweet too.

  26. Sally Ann/Dangerous Dan
    January 23rd, 2009 at 11:59 am

    Salvation Army should be good stewards of money received by the public’s good hearts.

    Our firm has been priviledged to obtain very damaging information about the army. Do not challenge the army for your life may be in danger. The army will come after you and try to destroy you, your family, your career and home. Be careful.

  27. Flu-Bird
    February 20th, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    He realy should have left %100 for the SALVATION ARMY and 0% for GREENPEACE

  28. Birdzilla
    March 11th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    SALVATION ARMY YES GRENPEACE NO

  29. My tooth hurts...
    March 17th, 2009 at 9:59 am

    Hi Joe! Thanks for your input.

  30. Anonymous2
    May 5th, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    Thanks Sally Ann/Dangerous Dan for the warning! I work for the Salvation Army and echo what many have said here. They are a cult. I pray I will be able to get out, and get out soon! Do not give money to the Salvation Army. Give it to your local church instead.

  31. S.A.
    May 10th, 2009 at 6:36 pm

    You can get out Anonymous2. It’s not easy, but have courage and go for it. You may also find counselling helpful, and remember to talk about it with your non-cult friends and family. They love you and they want to help - it will be very hard for them to see you go through this.

    A few years ago my partner got out after about a year in the cult. He was subjected to mind control techniques, expected to give the Sallies all his money, and forced to break off all contact with his old friends and family. They even took away his cellphone to try to stop him contacting his friends and family! It was like he just vanished. For months I didn’t know where he was or even if he was alive. They had told him he could never see me or talk to me again; if he had a girlfriend she had to be from the Sallies. He had a lot of mental health issues related to the mind control experience and this is why I suggest counselling may be able to help you.

    The good news is that now our lives are back to normal and we have moved on. Be brave and God bless!

  32. wannastang62
    June 22nd, 2009 at 11:36 pm

    I have been working at the Salvation Army for almost two yrs. Everything on here is so true. I have worked all my life, had many good jobs and some not so good, but I have never had such crooked, evil bosses. On my 2nd day here my boss was sreaming at one of the employees training me on the floor infront of customers. We have had many great employees quit because of all the harrassment going on at Our Super Salvation Store. Many employees have made complaints about it to our bigger bosses at the main store and nothing has happened. Because they have free houses, cars and their bills are all paid for. Our manager and assistant manager were also caught on camera by a employee that quit, stealing bags and bags of stuff out the back door of our store and our so called supervisers from our main office covered up for them. The truck drivers that we have don’t want to come to our store anymore because they get harrassed from our bosses. We are losing customers by the day because our bosses are so hateful to them. I’m not going to be there much longer, can’t handle the negative bosses that I have. I believe that when it first started it was great….the ARC, but somehow over the years the majors, captains, ministers, and all the other bosses got so mean and crooked. Yes, it is a cult. One I don’t want to have anything to do with anymore.


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS