<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Radioactive Diet.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/05/12/the-radioactive-diet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/05/12/the-radioactive-diet/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miranda Vink</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/05/12/the-radioactive-diet/comment-page-1/#comment-110458</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda Vink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/05/12/the-radioactive-diet/#comment-110458</guid>
		<description>This is not as crazy as it sounds. There was a recent BBC documentary about Chernobyl. They found that the contamination risk in areas further from the &quot;epicenter&quot; was not as high as previously believed. The nature around Chernobyl was pretty much normal. The radiation levels were still too high but it wasn&#039;t as harmful as expected. No mutations, no altered genes. They offered even the hypothesis that small doses of radiation could even be advantageous to your health since the percentage of cancer deaths was lower in areas with high natural radiance levels. This was true for the US as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not as crazy as it sounds. There was a recent BBC documentary about Chernobyl. They found that the contamination risk in areas further from the &#8220;epicenter&#8221; was not as high as previously believed. The nature around Chernobyl was pretty much normal. The radiation levels were still too high but it wasn&#8217;t as harmful as expected. No mutations, no altered genes. They offered even the hypothesis that small doses of radiation could even be advantageous to your health since the percentage of cancer deaths was lower in areas with high natural radiance levels. This was true for the US as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:53:14 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0508 seconds -->
