<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Shrinking Cadbury Egg.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:48:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-102371</link>
		<dc:creator>boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-102371</guid>
		<description>We featured this issue on Unbound Edition today.

Please see this link for our call to action: http://www.unboundedition.com/content/view/333/50/

Thanks! Hopefully we can get the rest of our egg back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We featured this issue on Unbound Edition today.</p>
<p>Please see this link for our call to action: <a href="http://www.unboundedition.com/content/view/333/50/" rel="nofollow">http://www.unboundedition.com/content/view/333/50/</a></p>
<p>Thanks! Hopefully we can get the rest of our egg back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96637</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96637</guid>
		<description>These kinds of things are more common than you think - it&#039;s basically a way to increase the cost of goods without actually increasing the price (less of the product at same price = greater profit).

My biggest complaint is dishwashing liquid: they give you  less liquid (more sudsing action! same cleaning power! concentrated solution!) for the same price or slightly less, knowing full well people will squirt the same amount onto their dishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These kinds of things are more common than you think &#8211; it&#8217;s basically a way to increase the cost of goods without actually increasing the price (less of the product at same price = greater profit).</p>
<p>My biggest complaint is dishwashing liquid: they give you  less liquid (more sudsing action! same cleaning power! concentrated solution!) for the same price or slightly less, knowing full well people will squirt the same amount onto their dishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96487</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96487</guid>
		<description>Lady Cooper -&gt; The wrapper hasn&#039;t changed, I meant it was different from the US version In the video, it has blue and a little green in it, instead of the canadian wrapper which is just purple, red and yellow. But that may be just because of the quality of the video.

And yeah, I&#039;m pretty sure they haven&#039;t changed in size, on a box of 3 I bought a little before easter, it says 1.38oz ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lady Cooper -&gt; The wrapper hasn&#8217;t changed, I meant it was different from the US version In the video, it has blue and a little green in it, instead of the canadian wrapper which is just purple, red and yellow. But that may be just because of the quality of the video.</p>
<p>And yeah, I&#8217;m pretty sure they haven&#8217;t changed in size, on a box of 3 I bought a little before easter, it says 1.38oz ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96450</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96450</guid>
		<description>According to wikipedia, the eggs did decrease in size by 12.3%, but only in the US. So write letters to the Hershey company and maybe they&#039;ll switch it back to the bigger size for next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to wikipedia, the eggs did decrease in size by 12.3%, but only in the US. So write letters to the Hershey company and maybe they&#8217;ll switch it back to the bigger size for next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96420</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96420</guid>
		<description>This reminds me to the New Coke crap back in the 80&#039;s just to slip us classic coke with corn syrup instead of sugar. I hasn&#039;t been the same since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me to the New Coke crap back in the 80&#8242;s just to slip us classic coke with corn syrup instead of sugar. I hasn&#8217;t been the same since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96390</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96390</guid>
		<description>I agree, the lie about me getting bigger is just insulting. I ate the last one ever this year, since I don&#039;t like being both ripped off and played for a fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the lie about me getting bigger is just insulting. I ate the last one ever this year, since I don&#8217;t like being both ripped off and played for a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96278</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 03:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96278</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care that much they&#039;ve gotten smaller, but don&#039;t lie about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care that much they&#8217;ve gotten smaller, but don&#8217;t lie about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96263</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 02:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96263</guid>
		<description>Are you sure David? I haven&#039;t noticed a different wrapper, the same purple and red one as always, but I think they have gotten smaller here too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure David? I haven&#8217;t noticed a different wrapper, the same purple and red one as always, but I think they have gotten smaller here too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96244</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96244</guid>
		<description>Is this a us only problem? here in canada the eggs are the same size they always were... but I think they don&#039;t manufacture them at the same place, since the wrapping is different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a us only problem? here in canada the eggs are the same size they always were&#8230; but I think they don&#8217;t manufacture them at the same place, since the wrapping is different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artschild</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96184</link>
		<dc:creator>artschild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96184</guid>
		<description>The point is not really in the size, itself, to me... it&#039;s the shape.  The experience of eating them used to be just right - almost a little sexual in its level of sensuality.  Yes, the amount of sugar was near coma-inducing, but you could break open the thick chocolate, fit your tongue inside the egg to scoop out the cream, and then the remaining shell pieces would be curved just about right to fit between tongue and roof of the mouth, and melt there, delivering the full-mouth smooth Cadbury&#039;s mega-chocolate experience.  That sudden 12% decrease in size has made the curves too tight, and the chocolate too thin to be all that satisfying as a multi-sensory experience.  Even if the recipe hasn&#039;t changed, it was never really all about the flavor, by itself.  As a result, I&#039;ve only eaten two this year, and I think I may be off them for good, now.  *sigh*  Blast you, Hershey&#039;s, for messing with perfection!!! *shakes fist in the air*  Oh well.  Guess I&#039;m eating healthier this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is not really in the size, itself, to me&#8230; it&#8217;s the shape.  The experience of eating them used to be just right &#8211; almost a little sexual in its level of sensuality.  Yes, the amount of sugar was near coma-inducing, but you could break open the thick chocolate, fit your tongue inside the egg to scoop out the cream, and then the remaining shell pieces would be curved just about right to fit between tongue and roof of the mouth, and melt there, delivering the full-mouth smooth Cadbury&#8217;s mega-chocolate experience.  That sudden 12% decrease in size has made the curves too tight, and the chocolate too thin to be all that satisfying as a multi-sensory experience.  Even if the recipe hasn&#8217;t changed, it was never really all about the flavor, by itself.  As a result, I&#8217;ve only eaten two this year, and I think I may be off them for good, now.  *sigh*  Blast you, Hershey&#8217;s, for messing with perfection!!! *shakes fist in the air*  Oh well.  Guess I&#8217;m eating healthier this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96177</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96177</guid>
		<description>Best served on a bed of ice cream from a 56oz tub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best served on a bed of ice cream from a 56oz tub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96160</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96160</guid>
		<description>THe smaller size doesn&#039;t taste that good either ... the gooey stuff is what tastes the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THe smaller size doesn&#8217;t taste that good either &#8230; the gooey stuff is what tastes the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c-dub</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96148</link>
		<dc:creator>c-dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96148</guid>
		<description>Anon, that&#039;s the nature of language and accents. Claiming ours is &quot;right&quot; and someone else&#039;s is &quot;wrong&quot; is just silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, that&#8217;s the nature of language and accents. Claiming ours is &#8220;right&#8221; and someone else&#8217;s is &#8220;wrong&#8221; is just silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aramax</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96141</link>
		<dc:creator>Aramax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96141</guid>
		<description>The Cad-bew-ry mini eggs are really bad... almost 4$ for a small bag of 43 grams... I dont even know what they put in their candy anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cad-bew-ry mini eggs are really bad&#8230; almost 4$ for a small bag of 43 grams&#8230; I dont even know what they put in their candy anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96126</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 17:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96126</guid>
		<description>I hate when americans pronounce things wrong. It&#039;s not Cad-berry, It&#039;s Cad-bry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate when americans pronounce things wrong. It&#8217;s not Cad-berry, It&#8217;s Cad-bry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cybele</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96121</link>
		<dc:creator>cybele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 17:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96121</guid>
		<description>Oh, wait, I just noticed that the website is the UK version. The eggs that we eat here in the States are made by license by Hershey&#039;s. There&#039;s no mention of the change on the Hershey&#039;s/Cadbury site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, wait, I just noticed that the website is the UK version. The eggs that we eat here in the States are made by license by Hershey&#8217;s. There&#8217;s no mention of the change on the Hershey&#8217;s/Cadbury site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cybele</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96120</link>
		<dc:creator>cybele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 17:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96120</guid>
		<description>I save wrappers and can definitely say that they changed from 1.38 ounces to 1.2 ounces this year. (Well, I also reviewed them last year and the new orange one this year and did notice the difference.)

I don&#039;t necessarily mind that they got a little smaller, but the note on their website is disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I save wrappers and can definitely say that they changed from 1.38 ounces to 1.2 ounces this year. (Well, I also reviewed them last year and the new orange one this year and did notice the difference.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily mind that they got a little smaller, but the note on their website is disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96093</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96093</guid>
		<description>Or change it and call us fat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or change it and call us fat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAgent</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96088</link>
		<dc:creator>PAgent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96088</guid>
		<description>I *really* hate being lied to by corporations. If they change the size of the egg, that&#039;s one thing, but don&#039;t pretend it never happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I *really* hate being lied to by corporations. If they change the size of the egg, that&#8217;s one thing, but don&#8217;t pretend it never happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rek</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96068</link>
		<dc:creator>rek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 14:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96068</guid>
		<description>Oh no! Slightly less junk food!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no! Slightly less junk food!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96066</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 13:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96066</guid>
		<description>gaspola</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gaspola</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: owen</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96061</link>
		<dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 13:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96061</guid>
		<description>Class action lawsuit!
Hmmm... on second thought maybe now they&#039;re actually edible without risking going into a sugar induced coma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class action lawsuit!<br />
Hmmm&#8230; on second thought maybe now they&#8217;re actually edible without risking going into a sugar induced coma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JaG</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96038</link>
		<dc:creator>JaG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 12:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96038</guid>
		<description>OMG!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artschild</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/comment-page-1/#comment-96034</link>
		<dc:creator>artschild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 12:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/08/the-shrinking-cadbury-egg/#comment-96034</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe they insist it hasn&#039;t changed!  They lost an awful lot of sales to me because of this size change, blast &#039;em.  I usually stock up on those babies this time of year, but they just aren&#039;t as satisfying in the smaller size.  Grrrrrr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe they insist it hasn&#8217;t changed!  They lost an awful lot of sales to me because of this size change, blast &#8216;em.  I usually stock up on those babies this time of year, but they just aren&#8217;t as satisfying in the smaller size.  Grrrrrr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:06:40 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1845 seconds -->
