What’s the Difference: Art Deco vs. Art Nouveau.

Posted by Alex in Arts & Crafts, Mentalfloss on March 20, 2007 at 2:35 am



Image credits: Eiffel Tower from Milton CJ [flickr],
Chrysler Building from chrisinphilly5448 [flickr]

The Dilemma: You don’t want to look like an idiot on Antiques Roadshow.

People You Can Impress: Architecture buffs, art collectors, absinthe addicts, and flappers.

The Quick Trick: It all comes down to "flowery" vs. "streamlined." Art Nouveau is the decorative one. Art Deco is sleeker.

The Explanation: Both the Art Nouveau and Art Deco movements emerged as reactions to major world events; the Industrial Revolution and World War I, respectively. While both embraced modernist elements, they’re easy to distinguish if you know what to look for.

Art Nouveau [wiki] (it means "new art," but you probably figured that out) reigned from roughly 1880 until just before World War I. Art Nouveau embraced Europe’s new industrial aesthetic rather than challenging it. It features naturalistic but stylized forms, often combined with more geometric shapes, particularly arcs, parabolas, and semicircles (think of the paintings of Gustav Klimt, or the arches of the Eiffel Tower). The movement brought in natural forms that had often been overlooked like insects, weeds, even mythical faeries, as evidenced by Lalique jewelry or Tiffany lamps. The black and gold Kate Winslet doffs in the erotic portrait session scene in Titanic is quintessentially Art Nouveau.

Art Deco [wiki], on the other hand, emerged after World War I. In fact, the deprivations of the Great War years gave way to a whole new opulence and extravagance that defined the Jazz Age and the Art Deco aesthetic. The movement, prevalent from the 1920s until roughly the start of World War II, took its name from the 1925 Exposition Internationales des Arts Décoratifs et Industriels Modernes (say that ten times, fast), held in France and is characterized by streamlined and geometric shapes. It also utilized modern materials like chrome, stainless steel, and inlaid wood. If Art Deco dabbled with natural materials, they tended to be graphic or textural, like zebra skin or jagged fern leaves. As a result, Deco featured bold shapes like sunbursts and zigzags and broad curves. In fact, if you check out the spire of the Chrysler Building, the hotels of Miami’s South Beach, or the "coffin nose" oif a 1935 Cord Model 810, you’ll be staring at the very definition of Deco.

Of course, you don’t have to go outdoors if you’re looking for Deco. Furniture from the period - like the black leather and chrome chaise lounge by Le Corbusier or the Barcelona chair by Bauhaus giant Ludwig Mies van der Rohe - is still coveted by design aficionados and can be found in finer hotel lobbies everywhere.

The article above was reprinted from the mental_floss book "What’s the Difference?" with permission.

Monet? Manet? Who can even tell the difference? Well, with the help of the newest mental_floss tome, you can! … mental_floss gives you all the tips and tricks to have you sounding like a genius.


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post


FROM THE NEATORAMA ONLINE STORE - Your purchase helps support the blog!



COMMENT

16 comments to "What’s the Difference: Art Deco vs. Art Nouveau."

  1. MisterTrilby
    March 20th, 2007 at 10:21 am

    Your definition of art deco is partly confused with streamline moderne.

  2. faber
    March 20th, 2007 at 11:09 am

    i wouldn´t say neither Eiffel Tower nor Klimt’s paintings belongs to Art Noveau movement….The first has no-style, is an engineer construction; Gustav Klimt, Otto Wagner, Victor HOrta, …they belong to Viennese Secession, wich is not the same that Art nouveau.
    and i agree with Mr Trilby too.

  3. Alex
    March 20th, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    I confess that I know *nothing* about Art Deco or Art Nouveau, which is why I found the article quite interesting.

  4. Weakly
    March 20th, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    I still have no idea which is which.

    If Nouveau has “stylized forms, often combined with more geometric shapes, particularly arcs, parabolas, and semicircles” and Deco has “streamlined and geometric shapes… bold shapes like sunbursts and zigzags and broad curves”, how can I tell the one with the geometric shapes and arcs from the one with bold geometric shapes and broad curves?

  5. Jacob
    March 20th, 2007 at 2:50 pm

    Weakly: “I still have no idea which is which.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_nouveau

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_deco

    Look at enough of each, and you’ll be able to tell very easily. (Art Deco has never pleased me that much, really.)

  6. faber
    March 20th, 2007 at 4:12 pm

    difference for dummies: Nouveau is soft, flowing, Decó is sharp, static.

  7. Denita TwoDragons
    March 20th, 2007 at 6:44 pm

    Enh, I love both styles…when they’re done well, of course. ;-)

    –TwoDragons

  8. Ali
    March 21st, 2007 at 6:14 am

    @TwoDragons

    I agree! If it works well I’m all over it like a fat man on a free buffet!

    :p

  9. Denita TwoDragons
    March 21st, 2007 at 10:53 am

    @ Ali:

    “…like a fat man on a free buffet…”

    I’m so glad I finished my tea before reading that, or my shirt would be caffeinated right now! *snort!*

    –TwoDragons

  10. Ali
    March 21st, 2007 at 6:52 pm

    @TwoDragons

    *muffled mouth full of macaroni and cheese*

    What? o_o

    *snarf, gulp, burp!*

  11. Tom p
    March 22nd, 2007 at 9:04 pm

    is there a diffrence?? (joke)

  12. Storm
    March 25th, 2007 at 9:42 pm

    I was going to offer a big thank you for finally clearing that difference up for me, but it seems that there is some disagreement here so… I may or may not end up feeling gratitude towards you. At this stage I feel that it is too early to commit myself. Sorry.

  13. MooQuack
    August 13th, 2008 at 5:29 pm

    Who invented speed lines in the Art Deco era?

  14. trisha biggs
    September 16th, 2008 at 1:35 am

    another way to tell if it is art nouveau is the organic symbols. basically living things are portrayed in the items. art deco can be summed up in three words: frank llyod right.

  15. trisha biggs
    September 16th, 2008 at 1:53 am

    my last comment, i meant to say nouveau, not deco. F.L.W. styling has an organic feel.

  16. Di
    February 26th, 2009 at 10:30 am

    Well I think you answer the question with this article. But, off course the definition of an art movement is always blurry because it depends on the opinion of the viewer and also on the artist purpose. If an artist sets out to create a piece is he really thinking about the “rules” of a movement or is he simply creating art? I believe the source of the confusion is the manny different opinions that you can find about the same work. I do think it’s possible to tell them appart but does it really matter?? Art is to be absorved, enjoyed and not to be labeled and standardized. Instead of asking yourself if it’s Art Nouveau or Art Deco or Modern Art or whatever definition the critics invent, just ask how it makes you feel and what it tells you. Once a person gets the thinking trapped in rules he or she won’t be able to appreciate it for what it is but only for what others think of it.


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS