<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 18th Century Obstetrical Models.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/15/18th-century-obstetrical-models/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/15/18th-century-obstetrical-models/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:06:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alli</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/15/18th-century-obstetrical-models/comment-page-1/#comment-87971</link>
		<dc:creator>Alli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/15/18th-century-obstetrical-models/#comment-87971</guid>
		<description>I think that I am going to skip lunch today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that I am going to skip lunch today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aware</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/15/18th-century-obstetrical-models/comment-page-1/#comment-87950</link>
		<dc:creator>aware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/15/18th-century-obstetrical-models/#comment-87950</guid>
		<description>actually, i think it&#039;s the badly-preserved (and, ugh, preserved at all) dead babies in jars that&#039;s disturbing.

that, and the fact that the pregnant women peel back their own skin for you so you can see inside. aren&#039;t they just so sweet and helpful?

but conjoined twins in various degrees of conjoinment does not me out. people are people and come in various shapes and sizes. just be respectful. :) (see previous neatorama entry on the Hensel Twins.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, i think it&#8217;s the badly-preserved (and, ugh, preserved at all) dead babies in jars that&#8217;s disturbing.</p>
<p>that, and the fact that the pregnant women peel back their own skin for you so you can see inside. aren&#8217;t they just so sweet and helpful?</p>
<p>but conjoined twins in various degrees of conjoinment does not me out. people are people and come in various shapes and sizes. just be respectful. <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  (see previous neatorama entry on the Hensel Twins.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pld</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/15/18th-century-obstetrical-models/comment-page-1/#comment-87869</link>
		<dc:creator>pld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/15/18th-century-obstetrical-models/#comment-87869</guid>
		<description>Ah, dude, the first section was bad enough ... Let&#039;s just say I&#039;m happy to have been born as a man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, dude, the first section was bad enough &#8230; Let&#8217;s just say I&#8217;m happy to have been born as a man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:30:25 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0722 seconds -->
