<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#8217;s First Dynamically Balanced Walking Robot.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/08/worlds-first-dynamically-balanced-walking-robot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/08/worlds-first-dynamically-balanced-walking-robot/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:47:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: busters</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/08/worlds-first-dynamically-balanced-walking-robot/comment-page-1/#comment-100130</link>
		<dc:creator>busters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/08/worlds-first-dynamically-balanced-walking-robot/#comment-100130</guid>
		<description>the claim that this robot is the first dynamically balancing biped appears false (one can do a cursory search on the internet to view several earlier robotic bipeds with claims of dynamic balance).  If this claim is indeed shown to be false, Anybots and its owners (i.e.,  Trevor Blackwell and company) have possibly ruined their own credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the claim that this robot is the first dynamically balancing biped appears false (one can do a cursory search on the internet to view several earlier robotic bipeds with claims of dynamic balance).  If this claim is indeed shown to be false, Anybots and its owners (i.e.,  Trevor Blackwell and company) have possibly ruined their own credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bulldozers</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/08/worlds-first-dynamically-balanced-walking-robot/comment-page-1/#comment-85510</link>
		<dc:creator>bulldozers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/03/08/worlds-first-dynamically-balanced-walking-robot/#comment-85510</guid>
		<description>this robot and the accompanying press releases are all complete bs (unfortunately). Some lab tried to get a bit more PR than it really needed.

The blurb about the Asimo is simply false (i dont work for Honda or whatever).

The current ASIMO does in fact use ZMP (aka dynamic) - based balancing. And if you wanna see a REALLY good humanoid robot, (that can in fact stand up if completely pushed over) check out the now-cancelled Sony SDR-4X aka the QRIO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this robot and the accompanying press releases are all complete bs (unfortunately). Some lab tried to get a bit more PR than it really needed.</p>
<p>The blurb about the Asimo is simply false (i dont work for Honda or whatever).</p>
<p>The current ASIMO does in fact use ZMP (aka dynamic) &#8211; based balancing. And if you wanna see a REALLY good humanoid robot, (that can in fact stand up if completely pushed over) check out the now-cancelled Sony SDR-4X aka the QRIO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:32 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0479 seconds -->
