Security Scanner Can See Through Clothes

1. Britt
   February 23rd, 2007 at 11:49 pm

   Greeeaaaaat.

2. Neon Lite
   February 24th, 2007 at 12:10 am

   The Yank "terrorist" paranoia escalates to a new low. Too damn funny. :~)

3. Robert
   February 24th, 2007 at 12:16 am

   At present, it's intended for secondary screening. Would you rather this or being patted down?

4. astanhope
   February 24th, 2007 at 12:17 am

   Homeland Security Hysteria:

   Arabs hijacked planes on 9/11, therefore we need to push the technology envelope in order to see naked bodies underneath clothing at airports.

   Also, bottled water is disallowed - terrorists fly thirsty.

5. Anita
   February 24th, 2007 at 12:58 am

   Certainly doesn't paint the subject in the best light. I doubt anyone will be selling the videos under the adult category on ebay (or maybe they will, sickos).

6. Aramax
   February 24th, 2007 at 12:59 am

   You could make a bomb out of water... think about it!

   They should also disallow air since the H-bomb has been invented.

   All I know is that I wont be taking the plane to go places anytime soon. And if I do I would fly solo.

7. Alex
   February 24th, 2007 at 1:08 am

   Total Recall, anyone?

8. astanhope
   February 24th, 2007 at 1:10 am

   Alex:

   This post + this article = Total Recall

9. Alex
   February 24th, 2007 at 1:17 am

   That LiveScience article is awesome!

10. Britt
    February 24th, 2007 at 1:42 am

    It's not as though planes are the only things people blow up. Good grief, why not just hide under the bed for eternity? I'll take my chance on the plane.

11. Acedia
    February 24th, 2007 at 8:10 am

    Since this "x-ray" only seems to show the outside of the body (not bones) would it even show a gun or weapon secreted say "between the cheeks" or in an orifice? If not, isn't it kind of pointless?

    Speaking as someone who was forced to run the entire length of an airport to get a new baggie because the baggie I'd put my specially purchased 3 oz liquids in was not the correct size (but who later found that in the confusion of transferring them to the regulation size baggie that a whole slew of little containers of "undeclared liquids" had gone through the scanner in my carry on AND NO ONE EVEN NOTICED OR CARED!) the way our country has handled this situation makes us look like tantruming, brain-damaged toddlers -- lots of activity, not much sense.

12. Acedia
    February 24th, 2007 at 8:13 am

    Just for the record, the asterisks above blocked a medical term for a bodily opening...not anything rude (despite the fact that the letter count could work for either!) ROFLM*O!

13. ted
    February 24th, 2007 at 10:05 am

    Now I'm wondering what the medical term was.

    And about the whole "best light" of the poor naked man - you never know what it might look like when it's ready for action.

    The article says "your doctor sees you naked all the time". I doubt that airport security staff will be as professional about it as doctors.

    I predict a lot of ladies going through these things.

14. L
    February 24th, 2007 at 3:21 pm

    If everyone gets cancer from these devices, do the terrorists win?

15. Marvin The Magnificent
    February 25th, 2007 at 6:42 am

    It's worse than this in the UK.
    The government are drawing up plans to introduce this sort of scanner in street lamposts.

    See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6309917.stm

    I've had to take to lining my underpants with tin-foil.

    Marvin The Magnificent

16. jimbo
    February 25th, 2007 at 7:52 pm

    but ain't his tally whacker kinda small???

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT