<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faces of Beauty?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:06:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: XuYu</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-76739</link>
		<dc:creator>XuYu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 06:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/#comment-76739</guid>
		<description>DON&#039;T marry your cousin. Rudy Giuliani married his SECOND cousin and now look what&#039;s happened to him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DON'T marry your cousin. Rudy Giuliani married his SECOND cousin and now look what's happened to him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-76726</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/#comment-76726</guid>
		<description>the only thing I found profound about this is that after digitally averaging all these women they all look hispanic now. weird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only thing I found profound about this is that after digitally averaging all these women they all look hispanic now. weird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-76672</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/#comment-76672</guid>
		<description>I agree it may not be profound, I just thought it was neat (hence why I post at Neatorama and not Profoundorama ;) ).  

I often find that some level of asymmetry, along with look young, leads to a person being labeled as &quot;cute&quot; rather than &quot;beautiful&quot;.  Ashlee Simpson is a great example.  I thought she was as cute as a button before she got her nose job, but now she just looks plain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it may not be profound, I just thought it was neat (hence why I post at Neatorama and not Profoundorama <img src='http://www.neatorama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).  </p>
<p>I often find that some level of asymmetry, along with look young, leads to a person being labeled as "cute" rather than "beautiful".  Ashlee Simpson is a great example.  I thought she was as cute as a button before she got her nose job, but now she just looks plain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-76664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/#comment-76664</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d hit it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd hit it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-76620</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 23:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/#comment-76620</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right. Humans as a rule find average faces attractive (that is, many different faces morphed into one face to create an average of where the nose/eyes etc should be). This probably explains why the ratings seem a bit low for some very attractive girls. 

And like ToddZ said, the symmetry also makes the faces more attractive. Symmetry is an indication of health and proper development, so from an evolutionary perspective it makes sense that we should be attracted to symmetry so that we can produce healthier offspring!

I also agree that miss â€œ6.0-6.4â€³ is super cute. Miss â€œ9.5-10â€³ is stunning though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's right. Humans as a rule find average faces attractive (that is, many different faces morphed into one face to create an average of where the nose/eyes etc should be). This probably explains why the ratings seem a bit low for some very attractive girls. </p>
<p>And like ToddZ said, the symmetry also makes the faces more attractive. Symmetry is an indication of health and proper development, so from an evolutionary perspective it makes sense that we should be attracted to symmetry so that we can produce healthier offspring!</p>
<p>I also agree that miss â€œ6.0-6.4â€³ is super cute. Miss â€œ9.5-10â€³ is stunning though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddZ</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/comment-page-1/#comment-76601</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/13/faces-of-beauty/#comment-76601</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but I&#039;m not sure if this illustrates anything profound or not. If you morph 30 photos into each other, you&#039;ll always get a fairly symmetrical average of them, and it&#039;s known that we&#039;re wired to find symmetry attractive. You&#039;ll also tend to end up with average brown hair and eye color. So it&#039;s not really surprising that so many of these composites look similar, and that the main factor in lower rankings appears to be weight.

But miss &quot;6.0-6.4&quot; is the cutest...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but I'm not sure if this illustrates anything profound or not. If you morph 30 photos into each other, you'll always get a fairly symmetrical average of them, and it's known that we're wired to find symmetry attractive. You'll also tend to end up with average brown hair and eye color. So it's not really surprising that so many of these composites look similar, and that the main factor in lower rankings appears to be weight.</p>
<p>But miss "6.0-6.4" is the cutest...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-10 01:19:23 -->