Faces of Beauty?

1. ToddZ
   February 13th, 2007 at 4:23 pm

   Interesting, but I’m not sure if this illustrates anything profound or not. If you morph 30 photos into each other, you’ll always get a fairly symmetrical average of them, and it’s known that we’re wired to find symmetry attractive. You’ll also tend to end up with average brown hair and eye color. So it’s not really surprising that so many of these composites look similar, and that the main factor in lower rankings appears to be weight.

   But miss “6.0-6.4″ is the cutest…

2. Jess
   February 13th, 2007 at 6:07 pm

   That’s right. Humans as a rule find average faces attractive (that is, many different faces morphed into one face to create an average of where the nose/eyes etc should be). This probably explains why the ratings seem a bit low for some very attractive girls.

   And like ToddZ said, the symmetry also makes the faces more attractive. Symmetry is an indication of health and proper development, so from an evolutionary perspective it makes sense that we should be attracted to symmetry so that we can produce healthier offspring!

   I also agree that miss “6.0-6.4″ is super cute. Miss “9.5-10″ is stunning though.

3. Jimbo
   February 13th, 2007 at 9:05 pm

   I’d hit it

4. Anita
   February 13th, 2007 at 9:31 pm

   I agree it may not be profound, I just thought it was neat (hence why I post at Neatorama and not Profoundorama ).

   I often find that some level of asymmetry, along with look young, leads to a person being labeled as “cute” rather than “beautiful”. Ashlee Simpson is a great example. I thought she was as cute as a button before she got her nose job, but now she just looks plain.

5. Chad
   February 14th, 2007 at 12:29 am

   the only thing I found profound about this is that after digitally averaging all these women they all look hispanic now. weird

6. XuYu
   February 14th, 2007 at 1:22 am

   DON’T marry your cousin. Rudy Giuliani married his SECOND cousin and now look what’s happened to him!

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT