Comments on: Doomsday Clock to be Moved Forward. http://www.neatorama.com/2007/01/14/doomsday-clock-to-be-moved-forward/ The Neat Side of the Web Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:05:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ted http://www.neatorama.com/2007/01/14/doomsday-clock-to-be-moved-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-65435 ted Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:22:41 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/01/14/doomsday-clock-to-be-moved-forward/#comment-65435 Blah, blah, blah. The Mayans have already told us 2012. What more do we need? Blah, blah, blah.

The Mayans have already told us 2012. What more do we need?

]]> By: Lasse http://www.neatorama.com/2007/01/14/doomsday-clock-to-be-moved-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-65289 Lasse Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:40:14 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/01/14/doomsday-clock-to-be-moved-forward/#comment-65289 And perhaps because of Israels plan to use small nukes against Iran. And perhaps because of Israels plan to use small nukes against Iran.

]]> By: Alex http://www.neatorama.com/2007/01/14/doomsday-clock-to-be-moved-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-65268 Alex Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:19:27 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/01/14/doomsday-clock-to-be-moved-forward/#comment-65268 I disagree - their action is symbolic and represents the growing nuclear threat from North Korea and Iran. I disagree – their action is symbolic and represents the growing nuclear threat from North Korea and Iran.

]]> By: Bryan http://www.neatorama.com/2007/01/14/doomsday-clock-to-be-moved-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-65227 Bryan Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:29:51 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2007/01/14/doomsday-clock-to-be-moved-forward/#comment-65227 These guys never, ever knew what they were talking about. They're atomic scientists making predictions about fields in which they are not experts - geopolitics and war. Their opinion carries no more weight than yours or mine. It would be like having an expert on insects write books on human overpopulation or an expert on linguistics lecture on economics. He or she may have a point, true, (I'm not saying that people can't work outside their fields) but greatness in one field does not necessarily equal greatness in all fields. These guys never, ever knew what they were talking about. They’re atomic scientists making predictions about fields in which they are not experts – geopolitics and war. Their opinion carries no more weight than yours or mine. It would be like having an expert on insects write books on human overpopulation or an expert on linguistics lecture on economics. He or she may have a point, true, (I’m not saying that people can’t work outside their fields) but greatness in one field does not necessarily equal greatness in all fields.

]]>