<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Things Einstein Got Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Saraiva</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-633526</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Saraiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-633526</guid>
		<description>EINSTEIN IS WRONG – THE PROVE

António Saraiva – 2008-06-17
ajps2@hotmail.com


   In the relativity theory there is a called invariant value between two frames S^2:

                                                             S^2 = c^2t^2 – x^2

   But as x and t are considered to be independent coordinates space and time, the value of  S^2 varies between each pair of frames ( c is the light speed ).


                                           x = 4 ; t = 2 :   S^2 = 3.6E+17

                                           x = 6 ; t = 9 :   S^2 = 7.3E+18


    As it always exists a relative speed between each pair of frames, the value of  S^2 is a universal constant: 

                                     c^2tn^2 – xn^2 = k (universal constant)

                                      k = 4E-34m^2


   As so, we can give independent values to the variables x and t. If we give a value to one we can immediately calculate the other. So, x and t are not space and time but wavelength and period of an electromagnetic wave. 


                                      x = ( c^2t^2 – k )^0.5


   Thus, we prove that the space-time doesn’t exist. A direct consequence is that the vacuum light speed is variable with the frequency: 


                                     w = ( c^2 – kf^2 )^0.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EINSTEIN IS WRONG – THE PROVE</p>
<p>António Saraiva – 2008-06-17<br />
<a href="mailto:ajps2@hotmail.com">ajps2@hotmail.com</a></p>
<p>   In the relativity theory there is a called invariant value between two frames S^2:</p>
<p>                                                             S^2 = c^2t^2 – x^2</p>
<p>   But as x and t are considered to be independent coordinates space and time, the value of  S^2 varies between each pair of frames ( c is the light speed ).</p>
<p>                                           x = 4 ; t = 2 :   S^2 = 3.6E+17</p>
<p>                                           x = 6 ; t = 9 :   S^2 = 7.3E+18</p>
<p>    As it always exists a relative speed between each pair of frames, the value of  S^2 is a universal constant: </p>
<p>                                     c^2tn^2 – xn^2 = k (universal constant)</p>
<p>                                      k = 4E-34m^2</p>
<p>   As so, we can give independent values to the variables x and t. If we give a value to one we can immediately calculate the other. So, x and t are not space and time but wavelength and period of an electromagnetic wave. </p>
<p>                                      x = ( c^2t^2 – k )^0.5</p>
<p>   Thus, we prove that the space-time doesn’t exist. A direct consequence is that the vacuum light speed is variable with the frequency: </p>
<p>                                     w = ( c^2 – kf^2 )^0.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MisterTrilby</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-58796</link>
		<dc:creator>MisterTrilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-58796</guid>
		<description>Of course, when a scientist posits a theory that is later found to be flawed, he or she abandons it and begins to work on another solution. He didn't make blunders, he was constatly in the process of formulating theory and explanation based on evidence and physics. Don't think that Einstein stopped working for a moment. On the other hand, when religious 'theorists' are proved wrong (world not flat, universe older than 10,000 years) they ignore it and don't change their viewpoints at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, when a scientist posits a theory that is later found to be flawed, he or she abandons it and begins to work on another solution. He didn&#8217;t make blunders, he was constatly in the process of formulating theory and explanation based on evidence and physics. Don&#8217;t think that Einstein stopped working for a moment. On the other hand, when religious &#8216;theorists&#8217; are proved wrong (world not flat, universe older than 10,000 years) they ignore it and don&#8217;t change their viewpoints at all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jug</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-58789</link>
		<dc:creator>jug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-58789</guid>
		<description>Very good neato! There seems to ba an awful lot of Einstein bashing going on these days. I guess critics feel empowered: "Einstein was wrong on this point, and I am right, ergo I am smarter than Einstein!"
Sheesh! Can't we just accept the fact that he made some blunders, but put it all in context with 'Einstein, the thinker who came up with arguably the most brilliant thought that ANYBODY has EVER had?'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good neato! There seems to ba an awful lot of Einstein bashing going on these days. I guess critics feel empowered: &#8220;Einstein was wrong on this point, and I am right, ergo I am smarter than Einstein!&#8221;<br />
Sheesh! Can&#8217;t we just accept the fact that he made some blunders, but put it all in context with &#8216;Einstein, the thinker who came up with arguably the most brilliant thought that ANYBODY has EVER had?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neato</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-58771</link>
		<dc:creator>neato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-58771</guid>
		<description>Not so fast on item #2 - He may not have gotten that one wrong. Check out: 

http://www.quackgrass.com/roots/arp.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so fast on item #2 - He may not have gotten that one wrong. Check out: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.quackgrass.com/roots/arp.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.quackgrass.com/roots/arp.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
