<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Things Einstein Got Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:48:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Saraiva</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-633526</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Saraiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-633526</guid>
		<description>EINSTEIN IS WRONG – THE PROVE

António Saraiva – 2008-06-17
ajps2@hotmail.com


   In the relativity theory there is a called invariant value between two frames S^2:

                                                             S^2 = c^2t^2 – x^2

   But as x and t are considered to be independent coordinates space and time, the value of  S^2 varies between each pair of frames ( c is the light speed ).


                                           x = 4 ; t = 2 :   S^2 = 3.6E+17

                                           x = 6 ; t = 9 :   S^2 = 7.3E+18


    As it always exists a relative speed between each pair of frames, the value of  S^2 is a universal constant: 

                                     c^2tn^2 – xn^2 = k (universal constant)

                                      k = 4E-34m^2


   As so, we can give independent values to the variables x and t. If we give a value to one we can immediately calculate the other. So, x and t are not space and time but wavelength and period of an electromagnetic wave. 


                                      x = ( c^2t^2 – k )^0.5


   Thus, we prove that the space-time doesn’t exist. A direct consequence is that the vacuum light speed is variable with the frequency: 


                                     w = ( c^2 – kf^2 )^0.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EINSTEIN IS WRONG – THE PROVE</p>
<p>António Saraiva – 2008-06-17<br />
<a href="mailto:ajps2@hotmail.com">ajps2@hotmail.com</a></p>
<p>   In the relativity theory there is a called invariant value between two frames S^2:</p>
<p>                                                             S^2 = c^2t^2 – x^2</p>
<p>   But as x and t are considered to be independent coordinates space and time, the value of  S^2 varies between each pair of frames ( c is the light speed ).</p>
<p>                                           x = 4 ; t = 2 :   S^2 = 3.6E+17</p>
<p>                                           x = 6 ; t = 9 :   S^2 = 7.3E+18</p>
<p>    As it always exists a relative speed between each pair of frames, the value of  S^2 is a universal constant: </p>
<p>                                     c^2tn^2 – xn^2 = k (universal constant)</p>
<p>                                      k = 4E-34m^2</p>
<p>   As so, we can give independent values to the variables x and t. If we give a value to one we can immediately calculate the other. So, x and t are not space and time but wavelength and period of an electromagnetic wave. </p>
<p>                                      x = ( c^2t^2 – k )^0.5</p>
<p>   Thus, we prove that the space-time doesn’t exist. A direct consequence is that the vacuum light speed is variable with the frequency: </p>
<p>                                     w = ( c^2 – kf^2 )^0.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MisterTrilby</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-58796</link>
		<dc:creator>MisterTrilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-58796</guid>
		<description>Of course, when a scientist posits a theory that is later found to be flawed, he or she abandons it and begins to work on another solution. He didn&#039;t make blunders, he was constatly in the process of formulating theory and explanation based on evidence and physics. Don&#039;t think that Einstein stopped working for a moment. On the other hand, when religious &#039;theorists&#039; are proved wrong (world not flat, universe older than 10,000 years) they ignore it and don&#039;t change their viewpoints at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, when a scientist posits a theory that is later found to be flawed, he or she abandons it and begins to work on another solution. He didn&#8217;t make blunders, he was constatly in the process of formulating theory and explanation based on evidence and physics. Don&#8217;t think that Einstein stopped working for a moment. On the other hand, when religious &#8216;theorists&#8217; are proved wrong (world not flat, universe older than 10,000 years) they ignore it and don&#8217;t change their viewpoints at all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jug</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-58789</link>
		<dc:creator>jug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-58789</guid>
		<description>Very good neato! There seems to ba an awful lot of Einstein bashing going on these days. I guess critics feel empowered: &quot;Einstein was wrong on this point, and I am right, ergo I am smarter than Einstein!&quot;
Sheesh! Can&#039;t we just accept the fact that he made some blunders, but put it all in context with &#039;Einstein, the thinker who came up with arguably the most brilliant thought that ANYBODY has EVER had?&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good neato! There seems to ba an awful lot of Einstein bashing going on these days. I guess critics feel empowered: &#8220;Einstein was wrong on this point, and I am right, ergo I am smarter than Einstein!&#8221;<br />
Sheesh! Can&#8217;t we just accept the fact that he made some blunders, but put it all in context with &#8216;Einstein, the thinker who came up with arguably the most brilliant thought that ANYBODY has EVER had?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neato</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-58771</link>
		<dc:creator>neato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/12/19/four-things-einstein-got-wrong/#comment-58771</guid>
		<description>Not so fast on item #2 - He may not have gotten that one wrong. Check out: 

http://www.quackgrass.com/roots/arp.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so fast on item #2 &#8211; He may not have gotten that one wrong. Check out: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.quackgrass.com/roots/arp.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.quackgrass.com/roots/arp.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:06:10 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0689 seconds -->
