Comments on: A new way to multiply http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/ The Neat Side of the Web Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:18:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Kevin http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/comment-page-1/#comment-52946 Kevin Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:10:04 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/#comment-52946 Congratulations, you've discovered the polynomial equation. Try 76 x 69. It's not so convenient, or easy, and exposes that you're not really using anything different than old-school multiplication. Congratulations, you’ve discovered the polynomial equation.

Try 76 x 69. It’s not so convenient, or easy, and exposes that you’re not really using anything different than old-school multiplication.

]]> By: Botunda http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/comment-page-1/#comment-52924 Botunda Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:42:16 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/#comment-52924 I think I'll stick to using a cacualtor. But that was pretty neat! I think I’ll stick to using a cacualtor. But that was pretty neat!

]]>