<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new way to multiply</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/#comment-52946</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 02:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/#comment-52946</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, you've discovered the polynomial equation.

Try 76 x 69.  It's not so convenient, or easy, and exposes that you're not really using anything different than old-school multiplication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, you&#8217;ve discovered the polynomial equation.</p>
<p>Try 76 x 69.  It&#8217;s not so convenient, or easy, and exposes that you&#8217;re not really using anything different than old-school multiplication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Botunda</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/#comment-52924</link>
		<dc:creator>Botunda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/11/18/a-new-way-to-multiply/#comment-52924</guid>
		<description>I think I'll stick to using a cacualtor. But that was pretty neat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ll stick to using a cacualtor. But that was pretty neat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
