<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flying Car Uncovered by Google Earth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 03:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>Yet another flying car visible with Google Earth?

All of us remember this strange story when appeared in The Register showing a flying car in Perth, Western Australia. Well, australian people have done it again and here is a second flying car!, this time in Cockburn, a city located about 22km south of the Perth CBD. 

http://www.flyinglobe.com/2006/03/15/another-flying-car-in-australia/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another flying car visible with Google Earth?</p>
<p>All of us remember this strange story when appeared in The Register showing a flying car in Perth, Western Australia. Well, australian people have done it again and here is a second flying car!, this time in Cockburn, a city located about 22km south of the Perth CBD. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flyinglobe.com/2006/03/15/another-flying-car-in-australia/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flyinglobe.com/2006/03/15/another-flying-car-in-australia/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s a sign.  If Google Maps published roads in that part of Austrailia, there might be a picture of the place.  Oh well, don&#039;t mean to destroy all the fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a sign.  If Google Maps published roads in that part of Austrailia, there might be a picture of the place.  Oh well, don&#8217;t mean to destroy all the fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Dollak</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Dollak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>Hey...  Pretty sharp, Keith!  I think you nailed it.  Kind of reminds me of the &quot;face on Mars&quot; picture...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8230;  Pretty sharp, Keith!  I think you nailed it.  Kind of reminds me of the &#8220;face on Mars&#8221; picture&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ::mwah::</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>::mwah::</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/#comment-993</guid>
		<description>I think that Keith solved the mystery.  Wtg, Keith!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Keith solved the mystery.  Wtg, Keith!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/#comment-982</guid>
		<description>Could also be a black car parked parallel to the white one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could also be a black car parked parallel to the white one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Dollak</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Dollak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2006/01/25/flying-car-uncovered-by-google-earth/#comment-979</guid>
		<description>Cool photo!  Highly improbable, though.  Given the number of ground-level collisions that occur, one would still need to earn an aviator&#039;s license before flying anything, even if it looks like a car.  The photograph could easily have been faked, of course; the first step in confirming this would be to look at an enlarged hi-rez copy and see if the pixel-pattern changes where the flying car is.  Another possibility is that the car is actually a display mounted atop a pole, as one might find at a used-car dealership.  Given the apparent time-of-day indicated by the shadows, the pole&#039;s shadow would be eclipsed by the car&#039;s in this photo, and a reflective metal pole of steel would be virtually invisible in a picture of this quality.

Even still...  It would make traffic jams and parallel parking a lot easier to deal with!  I like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool photo!  Highly improbable, though.  Given the number of ground-level collisions that occur, one would still need to earn an aviator&#8217;s license before flying anything, even if it looks like a car.  The photograph could easily have been faked, of course; the first step in confirming this would be to look at an enlarged hi-rez copy and see if the pixel-pattern changes where the flying car is.  Another possibility is that the car is actually a display mounted atop a pole, as one might find at a used-car dealership.  Given the apparent time-of-day indicated by the shadows, the pole&#8217;s shadow would be eclipsed by the car&#8217;s in this photo, and a reflective metal pole of steel would be virtually invisible in a picture of this quality.</p>
<p>Even still&#8230;  It would make traffic jams and parallel parking a lot easier to deal with!  I like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:23:37 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0726 seconds -->
